Teddy's liberal sissy law
  
STVTalk.com Forum Index
STVTalk.com
All about Satellite TV systems.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
   
Google
 
Web stvtalk.com
Teddy's liberal sissy law

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    STVTalk.com Forum Index -> StarBand
Author Message
Ked Tennedy
Guest





Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:27 pm    Post subject: Teddy's liberal sissy law Reply with quote

A genuine Boortz from http://boortz.com/nuze/200504/04272005.html#florida

THAT NEW FLORIDA SELF DEFENSE LAW
Florida Governor Jeb Bush has now signed the bill .. and the left is mightily upset. The bill? You know, that bill that actually recognizes the basic human right of self defense. Simply put, the new Florida law says that if find yourself under attack in a public place you don't have to look for a way to run away before you respond with deadly force. Here's your actual wording: In Florida a person now has "the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so, to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another."

What, pray tell, is the problem with that? You're attacked. You have a reasonable belief that you are in danger of great harm or death, or someone else is in danger, and you get to protect yourself with deadly force. Imagine that! A basic human right is the right of self defense. The very first governments formed by humankind were governments formed for one purpose ... to act to defend the people.

But what about the opponents? Well, it's the same old cast of characters. The mainstream media and liberals ... Democratic leftists. Democrats have a long history of opposing virtually any law that would allow a person to exercise their right to self defense. Most of you don't remember this, but about 30 years ago Ted "The Slug" Kennedy came up with a law introducing a new Federal Criminal Code. His idea was to compel the 50 states to adopt the federal code as their own. In that bill there was a retreat requirement. If you woke up in the middle of the night and heard someone rummaging around your home, you would be required to leave your home to the intruder if there was any way you could escape. You were simply not allowed to protect your home and its contents if you had the option to turn tail and run. Thankfully, Kennedy's bill failed.

But why is it that Democrats always seem to oppose measures like this? Because it's all part of the standard Democratic/leftist mindset. It's part of the war against individualism. It's part of building reliance and dependence on government. A law like Florida's actually reinforces the concept of individualism. It recognizes the individual's right to self defense; the individual's right to dominion over their own body, their own personal safety and their own future. Don't we realize that we're supposed to depend on government to protect us? How dare we take that responsibility on ourselves? To the liberal, it is the government that gives us, if it chooses to do so, the right to defend ourselves; and since our right to self-defense comes from the government, then it is the government's right and responsibility to tell us just what we can and can't do to defend our lives and our property.

Recognizing one's right to self defense only serves to reinforce our sense of individuality. Remember, Democrats have flatly stated that our nation is at war against individuality. Attacking the individual right of self defense is part and parcel of that war.

Oh .. and as for those hysterical leftists who will scream about the "Wild Wild West?" You need to know that there was less crime in the so-called Wild Wild West, where everyone carried a gun, then there is in almost any major urban area in America today.
Back to top
Sam
Guest





Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 4:08 pm    Post subject: Re: Teddy's liberal sissy law Reply with quote

actually that is a myth that people in the wild west carried shooten
irons in town
for the most part towns were quite and civilized and people respected other
peoples space and viewed guns as a tool unlike today were guns are viewed as
a means of power and control

Ked Tennedy wrote:
Quote:
A genuine Boortz from *http://boortz.com/nuze/200504/04272005.html#florida*

*THAT NEW FLORIDA SELF DEFENSE LAW*

Florida Governor Jeb Bush has now signed the bill
http://www.flsenate.gov/session/index.cfm?Mode=Bills&SubMenu=1&BI_Mode=ViewBillInfo&BillNum=0436
.. and the left is mightily upset. The bill? You know, that bill that
actually recognizes the basic human right of self defense
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/florida/sfl-fsign27apr27,0,3075858.story?coll=sfla-news-florida>.
Simply put, the new Florida law says that if find yourself under attack
in a public place you don't have to look for a way to run away before
you respond with deadly force. Here's your actual wording: In Florida
a person now has "the right to stand his or her ground and meet force
with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it
is necessary to do so, to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself
or herself or another."

What, pray tell, is the problem with that? You're attacked. You have a
reasonable belief that you are in danger of great harm or death, or
someone else is in danger, and you get to protect yourself with deadly
force. Imagine that! A basic human right is the right of self
defense. The very first governments formed by humankind were
governments formed for one purpose ... to act to defend the people.

But what about the opponents? Well, it's the same old cast of
characters. The mainstream media and liberals ... Democratic leftists.
Democrats have a long history of opposing virtually any law that would
allow a person to exercise their right to self defense. *Most of you
don't remember this, but about 30 years ago Ted "The Slug" Kennedy came
up with a law introducing a new Federal Criminal Code. His idea was to
compel the 50 states to adopt the federal code as their own. In that
bill there was a retreat requirement. If you woke up in the middle of
the night and heard someone rummaging around your home, you would be
required to leave your home to the intruder if there was any way you
could escape. You were simply not allowed to protect your home and its
contents if you had the option to turn tail and run. Thankfully,
Kennedy's bill failed.*

But why is it that Democrats always seem to oppose measures like this?
Because it's all part of the standard Democratic/leftist mindset. It's
part of the war against individualism. It's part of building reliance
and dependence on government. A law like Florida's actually reinforces
the concept of individualism. It recognizes the individual's right to
self defense; the individual's right to dominion over their own body,
their own personal safety and their own future. Don't we realize that
we're supposed to depend on government to protect us? How /dare/ we
take that responsibility on ourselves? To the liberal, it is the
government that /gives/ us, if it chooses to do so, the right to defend
ourselves; and since our right to self-defense comes from the
government, then it is the government's right and responsibility to tell
us just what we can and can't do to defend our lives and our property.

Recognizing one's right to self defense only serves to reinforce our
sense of individuality. Remember, Democrats have flatly stated that our
nation is at war against individuality. Attacking the individual right
of self defense is part and parcel of that war.

Oh .. and as for those hysterical leftists who will scream about the
"Wild Wild West?" You need to know that there was less crime in the
so-called Wild Wild West, where everyone carried a gun, then there is in
almost any major urban area in America today.
Back to top
peeps
Guest





Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 4:08 pm    Post subject: Re: Teddy's liberal sissy law Reply with quote

"Sam" <sam@samsneed.net> wrote in message

unlike today were guns are viewed as
Quote:
a means of power and control

just you libs, sammy..

The Constitution is not a living, breathing
document like you libs want it to be.. It doesnt change with
YOUR times to fit whatever mood you libs are in..
Back to top
Sam
Guest





Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 4:08 pm    Post subject: Re: Teddy's liberal sissy law Reply with quote

nope we democrats got as many guns as u do maybe more
we keep-em in the gun case not on the alter

peeps wrote:

Quote:
"Sam" <sam@samsneed.net> wrote in message

unlike today were guns are viewed as

a means of power and control


just you libs, sammy..

The Constitution is not a living, breathing
document like you libs want it to be.. It doesnt change with
YOUR times to fit whatever mood you libs are in..






Back to top
Sam
Guest





Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 4:08 pm    Post subject: Re: Teddy's liberal sissy law Reply with quote

seems to me like the only one wanting to change the constitution is
you and your buddies, you know the closet dwellers
by the way did you catch Howdy and his butt buddy holding hands
yesterday,,, he needs to come out of the closet and come clean

Sam wrote:

Quote:
nope we democrats got as many guns as u do maybe more
we keep-em in the gun case not on the alter

peeps wrote:

"Sam" <sam@samsneed.net> wrote in message

unlike today were guns are viewed as

a means of power and control



just you libs, sammy..

The Constitution is not a living, breathing
document like you libs want it to be.. It doesnt change with
YOUR times to fit whatever mood you libs are in..






Back to top
jda
Guest





Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:08 am    Post subject: Re: Teddy's liberal sissy law Reply with quote

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:32:13 -0500, Sam <sam@samsneed.net> wrote:

What good is a gun when it's stuffed away in a case?

Quote:
nope we democrats got as many guns as u do maybe more
we keep-em in the gun case not on the alter

peeps wrote:

"Sam" <sam@samsneed.net> wrote in message

unlike today were guns are viewed as

a means of power and control


just you libs, sammy..

The Constitution is not a living, breathing
document like you libs want it to be.. It doesnt change with
YOUR times to fit whatever mood you libs are in..






Back to top
Sam
Guest





Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 5:24 am    Post subject: Re: Teddy's liberal sissy law Reply with quote

same as lay-en it on a pedestal and bowing down in front of it


jda wrote:
Quote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:32:13 -0500, Sam <sam@samsneed.net> wrote:

What good is a gun when it's stuffed away in a case?


nope we democrats got as many guns as u do maybe more
we keep-em in the gun case not on the alter

peeps wrote:


"Sam" <sam@samsneed.net> wrote in message

unlike today were guns are viewed as


a means of power and control


just you libs, sammy..

The Constitution is not a living, breathing
document like you libs want it to be.. It doesnt change with
YOUR times to fit whatever mood you libs are in..








Back to top
jda
Guest





Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:31 am    Post subject: Re: Teddy's liberal sissy law Reply with quote

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:24:05 -0500, Sam <sam@samsneed.net> wrote:

I suppose you lefties do just that--genuflect before inanimate
objects....Kinda like Monica did!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:
same as lay-en it on a pedestal and bowing down in front of it


jda wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:32:13 -0500, Sam <sam@samsneed.net> wrote:

What good is a gun when it's stuffed away in a case?


nope we democrats got as many guns as u do maybe more
we keep-em in the gun case not on the alter

peeps wrote:


"Sam" <sam@samsneed.net> wrote in message

unlike today were guns are viewed as


a means of power and control


just you libs, sammy..

The Constitution is not a living, breathing
document like you libs want it to be.. It doesnt change with
YOUR times to fit whatever mood you libs are in..








Back to top
Sam
Guest





Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:44 am    Post subject: Re: Teddy's liberal sissy law Reply with quote

no we shoot those king of targets with a different kind of gun

jda wrote:

Quote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:24:05 -0500, Sam <sam@samsneed.net> wrote:

I suppose you lefties do just that--genuflect before inanimate
objects....Kinda like Monica did!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


same as lay-en it on a pedestal and bowing down in front of it


jda wrote:

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:32:13 -0500, Sam <sam@samsneed.net> wrote:

What good is a gun when it's stuffed away in a case?



nope we democrats got as many guns as u do maybe more
we keep-em in the gun case not on the alter

peeps wrote:



"Sam" <sam@samsneed.net> wrote in message

unlike today were guns are viewed as



a means of power and control


just you libs, sammy..

The Constitution is not a living, breathing
document like you libs want it to be.. It doesnt change with
YOUR times to fit whatever mood you libs are in..









Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    STVTalk.com Forum Index -> StarBand All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



FPGA Electronics Hardware and Peripherals Auto Forum
New Topics Powered by phpBB