| Author |
Message |
Billy Bin Laden
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:45 am Post subject:
Doltacrats stick it to the poor.....again! |
|
|
California's Latest Nutty Attack on Poor People
The elitist eco-hypocrites of San Francisco have a new weapon in their never-ending attack on poor people: Now they want to tax grocery bags at 17 cents a pop.
"The measure is primarily being pushed by environmentalists who view plastic grocery bags as a menace, not as a modern marvel of convenience," USA Today reported today.
Of course, 17 cents a bag won't mean anything to the Lexus leftists, but it's just another slap in the face of those who already struggle to scrape by in the expensive city in the expensive state.
"Folks take the free plastic bag for granted," sniffed Mark Murray of Californians Against Waste, which supports the scheme.
However, the fee "is an incredible amount of money to a consumer," noted Paul Smith of California Grocers Association. "Before you know it, that's an extra dollar to your food bill every time you go shopping."
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/11/23/154754.shtml |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jda
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:53 am Post subject:
Re: Doltacrats stick it to the poor.....again! |
|
|
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:45:55 -0500, "Billy Bin Laden"
<billy@oval.office.blowjobs.cum> wrote:
That's the stuff that'll keep the economy humming. Tax our bags--what
will the liberal freaks think of next?
jda
Always Fair and Unbiased!
| Quote: | California's Latest Nutty Attack on Poor People
The elitist eco-hypocrites of San Francisco have a new weapon in their never-ending attack on poor people: Now they want to tax grocery bags at 17 cents a pop.
"The measure is primarily being pushed by environmentalists who view plastic grocery bags as a menace, not as a modern marvel of convenience," USA Today reported today.
Of course, 17 cents a bag won't mean anything to the Lexus leftists, but it's just another slap in the face of those who already struggle to scrape by in the expensive city in the expensive state.
"Folks take the free plastic bag for granted," sniffed Mark Murray of Californians Against Waste, which supports the scheme.
However, the fee "is an incredible amount of money to a consumer," noted Paul Smith of California Grocers Association. "Before you know it, that's an extra dollar to your food bill every time you go shopping."
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/11/23/154754.shtml |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Effeminate Liberal Democr
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 25, 2004 8:04 am Post subject:
Re: Doltacrats stick it to the poor.....again! |
|
|
The liberals are such f'tards.
If they want to tax something, how about unsolicited junk mail?
Make the postal spamming credit card and mortage companies pay 17 cents for
each piece of crap mail they stuff in my box.
"jda" <jda@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:shm7q05n05fntj3u915b3rua7c95afngq8@4ax.com...
| Quote: | On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:45:55 -0500, "Billy Bin Laden"
billy@oval.office.blowjobs.cum> wrote:
That's the stuff that'll keep the economy humming. Tax our bags--what
will the liberal freaks think of next?
jda
Always Fair and Unbiased!
California's Latest Nutty Attack on Poor People
The elitist eco-hypocrites of San Francisco have a new weapon in their
never-ending attack on poor people: Now they want to tax grocery bags at
17 cents a pop.
"The measure is primarily being pushed by environmentalists who view
plastic grocery bags as a menace, not as a modern marvel of convenience,"
USA Today reported today.
Of course, 17 cents a bag won't mean anything to the Lexus leftists, but
it's just another slap in the face of those who already struggle to scrape
by in the expensive city in the expensive state.
"Folks take the free plastic bag for granted," sniffed Mark Murray of
Californians Against Waste, which supports the scheme.
However, the fee "is an incredible amount of money to a consumer," noted
Paul Smith of California Grocers Association. "Before you know it, that's
an extra dollar to your food bill every time you go shopping."
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/11/23/154754.shtml
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|